The suboptimal way to “win”

The California Lottery is running advertisements claiming that over a million Californians win the Super Lotto Plus each month. Obviously their definition of “win” is different than mine. I don’t think it can be counted a “win” for the month unless the player is cash-positive for the total of all his or her lottery plays for the month. Of those one million Californians that “win” in a given month, how many actually wind up cash positive? I don’t have an actual number, but it is far less than a million.

For Super Lotto Plus, the odds of getting any payout are approximately 1 in 23. However, almost half of those payouts are only one dollar, the cost of the play, so they only break even, which can hardly be considered a win.

Based on figures from the California Lottery web site, in March 2008 there were a total of 1,991,983 Super Lotto Plus payouts, which means that approximately 45.8 million plays were purchased. Of those, 1,194,156 paid out only the one dollar purchase price, 400,024 paid $2, 381,692 paid $8-12, and 16,111 paid $43 or more. That means only a total of 797,827 plays were cash positive, so fewer than a million Californians could be said to have won the Supper Lotto Plus in March. Perhaps the Lottery could be forgiven for exaggerating the number of winners by 25%, but in fact the real number of winners is probably much lower, because many people buy more than one play, and of course 22/23 of those plays lose one dollar.

It is likely that almost all of the persons receiving the payouts of $43 or more actually won, i.e, were cash-positive for their lottery “investments” for the month. Perhaps even the majority of people receiving $8-12 payouts are cash-positive. But it’s likely that very few of the $2 payouts went to people that were cash positive. If we assume (very conservatively) that half of the recipients of $2 payouts were cash-positive, then at most only 597,815 players were cash-positive for the month. That means that the Lottery is overstating the number of winners by at least 67%.

This entry was posted in Blog/website/news comments, The Suboptimal Way. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to The suboptimal way to “win”

  1. klaxophone says:

    Maybe the million winners are the people who don’t play.

  2. Eric says:

    If the lottery used that criterion, they could claim that more than 35 million Californians “win” the lottery every month. :-)

    At least those people are net cash neutral, which means that they on average doing more than $0.50 better than the people that buy tickets.

    “A strange game. The only winning move is not to play.” — Joshua, in _Wargames_

Leave a Reply