(updated May 2) WorldNetDaily reported on prefessional cleanup of a broken CFL costing Brandy Bridges of Ellsworth, Maine over $2000 (h/t Slashdot). Thanks to Hans Pufal for posting a comment referencing an article with a link to the EPA fact sheet on mercury in CFLs. It turns out that CFLs contain less mercury that would be emitted by power plants to power equivalent incandescent bulbs, and there are recommendations for dealing with broken CFLs which will NOT cost a lot of money.
Meta
Archives
Categories
Blogroll
- Armed and Dangerous
- Bill the Lizard
- boingboing
- Cato Unbound
- Craphound
- Curious Creature
- Dan Gillmor
- Dave Barry
- David Byrne
- Decrepit Old Fool
- Defective By Design
- Digital Cuttlefish
- Doc Searls
- Don Marti
- Factory Automation Software Blog
- Fark
- Freakonomics
- Freedom to Tinker
- Good Morning Silicon Valley
- Groklaw
- Hanford Lemoore
- Homeland Stupidity
- Leibson’s Law
- Monday Evening
- Neil Gaiman
- Rudy Rucker
- Russ Nelson
- Schneier on Security
- Science Comedian
- Slashdot
- The Volokh Conspiracy
- This Mind Intentionally Left Blank
- Tin “Man” Le
- Wil Wheaton
- xkcd
Seems that the original report on the $2000 cost of cleaning up a broken CFL was exaggerated. See here :
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2007/05/compact_fluorescent_lights_are.php#more
for a more reasoned article which claims that, taking into account the mercury emissions from power station, CFL’s are more environmentally friendly than incandescent bulds.