<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Commitment or confiscation?</title>
	<atom:link href="https://whats.all.this.brouhaha.com/2007/07/02/how-should-conflicts-between-rkba-and-other-liberties-be-resolved/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://whats.all.this.brouhaha.com/2007/07/02/how-should-conflicts-between-rkba-and-other-liberties-be-resolved/</link>
	<description>miscellaneous musings and random rantings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2015 09:12:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Les Hildenbrandt</title>
		<link>https://whats.all.this.brouhaha.com/2007/07/02/how-should-conflicts-between-rkba-and-other-liberties-be-resolved/comment-page-1/#comment-3526</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Les Hildenbrandt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 18:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whats.all.this.brouhaha.com/?p=544#comment-3526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t have a problem with prohibiting felons and insane people ownership of arms.  I dont have a problem with fellons being permanently barred from ownership of arms.

I do have a concerns about the crazy people issue.  Who gets to decide who is crazy?  Is it permanent?  If you have ever seen a therapist are you forever prohibited from owning arms?  There were questions about the details on the VTI shooter.  Was he commited, or just evaluated.

I think I dont think the government can be trusted to make this decision.

I agree, I would rather be armed myself with ability to defend myself, than be dissarmed in the hope that criminals / crazys are also disarmed.

Don&#039;t even get me started on the domestic violence thing.  Yes, some, maybe even most dv perps should be disarmed, but most states have laws where the police must arrest someone when they respond to a dv call.  A friend pulled the phone of the wall when his wifes boyfriend called (mid breakup preceding a divorce), cutting his hand in the process.  His wife yelled at him and they both left the house.  Two blocks away he gets pulled over for speeding.  The cop asks why his hand is cut, and he tells the cop what happened.  He gets arrested for dv and looses his guns.  This is not a violent man, he has never as much as touched anyone.  His wife said as much in court.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have a problem with prohibiting felons and insane people ownership of arms.  I dont have a problem with fellons being permanently barred from ownership of arms.</p>
<p>I do have a concerns about the crazy people issue.  Who gets to decide who is crazy?  Is it permanent?  If you have ever seen a therapist are you forever prohibited from owning arms?  There were questions about the details on the VTI shooter.  Was he commited, or just evaluated.</p>
<p>I think I dont think the government can be trusted to make this decision.</p>
<p>I agree, I would rather be armed myself with ability to defend myself, than be dissarmed in the hope that criminals / crazys are also disarmed.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t even get me started on the domestic violence thing.  Yes, some, maybe even most dv perps should be disarmed, but most states have laws where the police must arrest someone when they respond to a dv call.  A friend pulled the phone of the wall when his wifes boyfriend called (mid breakup preceding a divorce), cutting his hand in the process.  His wife yelled at him and they both left the house.  Two blocks away he gets pulled over for speeding.  The cop asks why his hand is cut, and he tells the cop what happened.  He gets arrested for dv and looses his guns.  This is not a violent man, he has never as much as touched anyone.  His wife said as much in court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>https://whats.all.this.brouhaha.com/2007/07/02/how-should-conflicts-between-rkba-and-other-liberties-be-resolved/comment-page-1/#comment-3511</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 22:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whats.all.this.brouhaha.com/?p=544#comment-3511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Personally I&#039;d much rather run the risk of being shot by a crazy person than be disarmed, or than requiring that the state try to actively find crazy people and commit them.  The latter is particularly scary, as I myself am almost certainly more than six sigmas out on some metrics.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Events like the Virginia Tech massacre, Columbine, etc. while unquestionably horrific, are blown up out of proportion by the media and by legislators that want to &quot;look tough on crime&quot;.  University students (and faculty and staff) are far more likely to die in auto accidents than by being shot on campus.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I&#8217;d much rather run the risk of being shot by a crazy person than be disarmed, or than requiring that the state try to actively find crazy people and commit them.  The latter is particularly scary, as I myself am almost certainly more than six sigmas out on some metrics.</p>
<p>Events like the Virginia Tech massacre, Columbine, etc. while unquestionably horrific, are blown up out of proportion by the media and by legislators that want to &#8220;look tough on crime&#8221;.  University students (and faculty and staff) are far more likely to die in auto accidents than by being shot on campus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
