But for Engineers/Scientists there is no use in a discussion of whether God was intelligent or not by installing exactly these laws of nature as we know them: they are facts! Whether nature – without guidance (see remark below) – could have achieved this is an open question.

Guidance: Think of a god, that is able to install “meta-laws-of-nature”, that is a set of rules, that define the interactions of all natural laws (kown and unknown to us!). The existance of such a god is not in conflict with science – simply because it does not play any role in normal science. But when we come closer to philosophy we have to consider this idea. DNA-analyses have shown a significant similarity between rats, mice, humans, apes, pigs, whales,… of the active genetic codes, so we (humans) share with them far than 90%! With _any_ of them! No Lie.

With some even more than 98%.

But what about paternity tests, do they rey on this slight margin on 1%-5%? No! They rely on the abundanly presence of non-coding regions. Only about 10%-20% of our DNA is really (or let’s reformulate that: directly) encoding our Genes. There are regions in the DNA that are – what? : scratch pads, arbitrary base sequences or whatever? What we found out is this:

The parents modify these non-coding regions and they are inherited by the children. Every parent has a distinguishable pattern that is encoded, not necessarily in the same region – we have thousands regions to imprint our pattern(s).

So, is God necessary for science? I don’t think so, because the laws of physics are enough to guide us.